![]() |
Ependymoma |
The information provided in this review is intended for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.
Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified healthcare provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Feel free to share this information page with them.
In this paper, we aim to communicate and share the insights garnered from MyChild’sCancer’s second opinion program (www.MyChildsCancer.org/our-services).
Through this program, we at MyChild’sCancer harness the expertise of a global network of specialists to offer second opinions for children with cancer facing complex circumstances.
We are a non-profit organization and our services are offered at no cost to you and to the families we support.
Our objective in this paper is to share the knowledge compiled from world-renowned experts’ opinions on individual cases, to equip parents and doctors worldwide with information and tools to take proactive steps in managing the child’s condition and ideally improve treatment outcomes.
We start with the basic info, moving into biology and treatment options, and we end with insights from real cases discussed by lead experts.
This review was prepared by Christina Katanov, a family coordinator at MyChild’sCancer, and was approved by the experts mentioned in it.
Last reviewed on 10/2024
Ependymoma
Ependymoma is a primary tumor, which means that it starts in either the brain or spine. The brain and spine are part of the central nervous system (CNS).
Ependymomas arise from the cells lining the ventricles (the fluid containing spaces within the brain) and central canal within the spinal cord.
Ependymomas are relatively rare tumors, accounting for 2–3% of all primary brain tumors. About 30% of pediatric ependymomas are diagnosed in children younger than three years of age. It is the third most common type of childhood brain tumor. The cause is unknown.
The most common types of cells in the central nervous system are neurons and glial cells. Tumors from neurons are rare. Glial cells are the cells that support the brain. Tumors that occur from these cells are called gliomas. Glial cell subtypes of the CNS include Astrocytes, Oligodendrocytes and Ependymal cells.
There are different subtypes and grades.
Most children have grade II or III variants of ependymoma in the brain. However, there is no significant behavioral difference between grade II and III tumors. The risk of tumor relapse or progression following standard treatments is influenced by clinical and biological factors, including histopathological and molecular characteristics.
Brain, spine.
Ependymomas in children usually appear in the brain, most commonly in the fourth ventricle or back part of the brain. Within this region, there are two subtypes: PFA (Posterior Fossa A) and PFB (Posterior Fossa B).
Several genetic mutations and molecular alterations are associated with ependymomas. Some of the common mutations include:
Ependymomas appear in different locations within the brain and spinal column; symptoms depend on the location and size of the tumor. The biology may also be different based on the location.
CT scan (computed tomography), MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), biopsy, Lumbar puncture.
Surgery, radiation therapy (traditional and proton beam) & chemotherapy.
Surgery
It’s important to note that a complete removal of the tumor is sometimes not possible because of the tumor location and concerns about damaging the surrounding normal brain tissue. The expertise of the neurosurgeons is critical in this context.
Chemotherapy
Radiation therapy
Biopsy
Some treatments, while increasing survival, may have significant side effects on children. Prior to treatment, your child may undergo neuropsychological testing.
MRI scans of the brain and/or spinal cord are usually done every three to four months for the first two years following diagnosis.
Preserve patient´s life.
N/A at the moment
To understand how brain tumors develop in children and identify personalized treatment strategies visit ‘The Pacific Pediatric Neuro-Oncology Consortium (PNOC)’- http://www.pnoc.us/about
In this section, we aim to communicate and share the insights gathered from MyChild’sCancer’s second opinion program (MyChildsCancer Services), where our goal is to find the best expert and treatment for each child’s unique circumstances.
The information below was given in specific and individual cases and does not serve as a treatment recommendation. In these cases, we have consulted with the following experts, who also approved this content:
Prof. Eric Bouffet, Professor of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto Canada.
Prof. Stefan Rutkowski, Professor for Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Director of Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology at UKE, Hamburg, Germany.
The information provided in this review is intended for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment.
Always seek the advice of your physician or other qualified healthcare provider with any questions you may have regarding a medical condition. Feel free to share this information page with them.
The inclusion of clinical trials in this review does not imply endorsement or recommendation by MyChild’sCancer. The decision to participate in a clinical trial should be made in consultation with your healthcare provider and after carefully considering the risks and potential benefits associated with the trial.
Based on data from St Jude and Toronto, it is now clear that, if feasible with acceptable risks, the optimal option for patients with recurrent ependymoma who experience a local relapse is the resection of the recurrent tumor followed by local radiotherapy. If patients had received radiotherapy during first-line treatment, the feasibility and dose-volume concepts of re-irradiation must be clarified individually, in accordance with the first radiotherapy plan and the MRI-images at relapse.
Some studies have looked at the impact of biological prognostic parameters, e.g. 1q gain in posterior fossa ependymoma, that has been identified as a marker of poor outcome more than 10 years ago. The evidence that 6q loss is a marker of poor prognosis is more recent, this has been described in 2021. In a report from Toronto, patients with ependymoma associated with 6q loss were divided in 2 groups: 1q gain+6q loss versus 1q balanced and 6q loss. Both groups seem to behave poorly, with early relapses. In the context of isolated 6q loss, most relapses are local (Baroni et al., Neuro-Oncology 2021).
Experience from SickKids Toronto and St. Jude Memphis indicates that patients with recurrent ependymoma have better outcomes when receiving craniospinal irradiation (CSI), while others still prefer to use local radiotherapy at relapse. It is crucial to note that once radiotherapy has been administered twice to the local site, craniospinal irradiation cannot be offered in the event of a new recurrence.
If feasible, one option for treatment of distant relapses of ependymoma is craniospinal irradiation (CSI). Local treatment of these distant relapses tends to lead to new relapses in other parts of the brain or spine. The St. Jude experience showed that all patients with distant relapses who received CSI had improved outcomes, with 17 out of 31 patients being long-term survivors (Tsang et al., Neuro-Oncology 2019). However, some groups prefer to give local conformal radiotherapy to the primary tumor and to metastases (without CSI), if the number and size of the metastatic lesions allows for this. Thus, the modalities of Irradiation should be decided individually, based on the specific constellation.
The consequences of CSI in young children:
Metformin:
Recent laboratory data have shown that metformin, an antidiabetic medication, increases trimethylation and suppresses tumor growth in posterior fossa ependymoma cells (PFA), which typically lose this modification. Metformin, known for its minimal side effects, has demonstrated therapeutic efficacy in vitro and in vivo in patient-derived PFA xenografts in mice. Following a 2021 publication (Panwalkar et al., Science Translational Medicine 2021) many patients have been treated with metformin, although no formal clinical trial has confirmed its activity. Discussions with colleagues worldwide reveal that metformin is being used either alone or in combination with oral etoposide.
Optune:
Optune, is a device that delivers Tumor Treating Fields (TTF) to the tumor. Although experience in children is still limited, ependymoma is included in the PBTC-048 clinical trial. Preclinical work with TTF has shown some activity against ependymoma (Makimoto et al., Neurology International 2021). Treatment with Optune requires a significant commitment, as patients need to wear the device for at least 18 hours per day and must keep their heads shaved.
Important: these options require the patient to show progression.